CONNECT member blogs on Swedish climate negotiation site

September 30, 2014 in News, Publications by Oscar Widerberg

A few days after the much discussed climate summit held in New York, CONNECT member Oscar Widerberg wrote a brief analysis on a Swedish climate negotaition blog discussing the outcomes of the week-long event. For Swedish readers, find the blog here.  If you don’t read Swedish, in short, the New York summit clearly high-lighted the increased attention given to non-state actors and sub-national authorities in promoting global climate governance. It opens up for a series of interesting questions on whether to further integrate these actors into the UNFCCC and what practical issues that need to be solved, in particular on how to reap synergies between different climate initiatives and avoid conflicts.

If you want more info, please don’t hesitate to contact: oscar.widerberg [at] vu.nl

Call for Papers “Beyond 2015: Exploring the Future of Global Climate Governance”, 20 November 2014, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

September 12, 2014 in Conferences, News by Marija Isailovic

As part of the Indian-European Multi-level Climate Governance Research Network (IECGN), the Institute for Environmental Studies (IVM), VU University Amsterdam, is pleased to announce the Call For Papers for the 2014 Amsterdam Conference “Beyond 2015: Exploring the Future of Global Climate Governance”. The 2014 Amsterdam Conference will be held on 20 November 2014 at De Rode Hoed, Amsterdam.

CONFERENCE THEME:
The international community is currently not on track to meet its global climate change mitigation targets. The emissions gap between the greenhouse gas reduction pledges made by countries party to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the mitigation pathway necessary to limit climate change within the range of 2 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels is widening. Acknowledging the need to close this ambition gap, policy makers and academics are discussing additional and alternative measures beyond the top-down, state-dominated targets and timetables approach. Referred to in the academic literature as, inter alia, transnational climate governance initiatives, international cooperative initiatives, climate clubs and networked climate governance, alternative climate governance arrangements are increasingly advocated as concrete solutions to the growing ambitions gap. Against this background, this conference invites papers that scrutinize available options for effective and legitimate climate change governance, both with the formal framework of the UNFCCC and beyond. Topics include, but are not limited to
– Empirical and theoretical assessments of alternative climate governance arrangements (including cities, clubs, international cooperative initiatives as well as transnational, regional and sub-national networks);
– Viable options for breaking the ongoing negotiation deadlock within the UNFCCC context;
– Analyses of the emerging complex climate governance architecture (including the question of fragmentation and the role of orchestration as a strategy);
– Positions and strategies of leading countries and negotiation blocks (i.e. BASIC) with regard to alternative climate governance arrangements.

TIMELINE:
September 30 – Deadline for submission of abstracts
October 15 – Notification of acceptance
November 15 – Deadline for submission of papers
November 20 – 2014 Amsterdam Conference

VENUE:
De Rode Hoed, Keizersgracht 102, 1015 CV Amsterdam
De Rode Hoed, or the Red Hat is located in the historical center of Amsterdam overviewing the Keizersgracht Canal. It is easily accessible from the Amsterdam Central Train Station which offers many train connections to and from the Amsterdam Schiphol Airport.

HOW TO APPLY:
Early career researchers and PhD students are highly encouraged to submit papers to utilize the platform to get feedback on their work from their peers and from senior researchers, and to explore of the scope of collaborative research in the area. The abstracts (max 300 words) should be submitted as PDF by email to marija.isailovic@vu.nl no later than 30 Sept, 2014.

COSTS FOR ATTENDING:
Please note that no participation fees will be charged. Financial support covering travel, accommodation and meals is only available for IECNG members.

FUNDING:
The conference is funded by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) in partnership with Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) and Indian Council of Social Science Research (ICSSR) as part of the research grant awarded in 2012-2015 to the Indian-European Multi-level Climate Governance Research Network (IECGN) research partners.

Frank Biermann, Marija Isailovic and Philipp Pattberg, conference chairs

For more information, please click Future_ClimateGovernance_CfP_Amsterdam20November

Publication of the CONNECT project’s analytical framework

August 21, 2014 in News, Publications by Oscar Widerberg

The CONNECT team has published a major milestone in the project: the analytical framework for mapping and measuring fragmentation across global governance architectures. The report introduces 4 indicators for measuring fragmentation (institutional-, normative-, discursive- and actor-constellations) along with a detailed protocol on how to map governance architectures. The framework will now be implemented across the three policy domains of fisheries, forests and energy.

For any questions, don’t hesitate to contact the team.

Download the framework here: CONNECT’s Conceptual Framework

New report on creating successful multi-stakeholder partnerships

August 15, 2014 in News, Publications by Oscar Widerberg

We’re proud to announce that today we launch the fresh report Transnational multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: Building blocks for success. The report dug into 15 years of research on multi-stakeholder partnerships – meaning collaborations between actors from state, markets and civil society – to find out if there are certain factors that can explain success or failure in this type of policy and governance instruments. The researchers, Philipp Pattberg and Oscar Widerberg, identified 9 building blocks for success including leadership, partners, goal setting, funding, management, monitoring, meta-governance, problem structure, and socio-political context.

Here’s the abstract:

Multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development – institutionalized transboundary interactions between public and private actors aiming at the provision of collective goods – are a central element of contemporary sustainability governance, in particularly since the 2002 Johannesburg World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD). They have been credited with closing the participation and implementation gap in sustainable development but also accused of privileging powerful interests and thereby consolidating the privatisation of governance and dominant neo-liberal modes of globalisation.

This report has surveyed recent scholarship to provide an evidence-based assessment of the performance of multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development with a view towards identifying the building blocks for successful and effective partnerships across a number of concrete implementation contexts and specific functions. While the overall aggregate performance of partnerships as a governance instrument is mixed at best, we identify and discuss nine building blocks that increase the likelihood for success: leadership, partners, goal setting, funding, management, monitoring, metagovernance, problem structure and socio-political context.

The findings contain important considerations for the many actors involved in the development and later the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals. It is also important for other areas such as climate change, where implementation of international goals increasingly are expected to be complemented by innovative and cross-sectoral transnational and hybrid modes of collaboration.

The report was commissioned by the International Civil Society Center (ICSC) and will feed straight into the German Ministry of Economic Cooperation and Development’s (BMZ) extensive discussion on a “Zukunftscharta“ (Charter of the Future – the Charter) that will guide its strategies for sustainable development.

You can download the full report for free here.

CONNECT engages in the Indian-European Multi-Level Climate Governance Research Network (IECGN)

March 12, 2014 in News by Marija Isailovic

In efforts to identify constraints and opportunities in strengthening responses to climate change on multiple levels of governance in India and EU and generate knowledge regarding conceptual, methodological and empirical developments in this area, CONNECT becomes engaged in the Indian-European Multi-Level Climate Governance Research Network (IECGN). IECGN is a collaborative research network of leading Indian and European academic institutions in the research of climate governance partnering with the Environmental Policy Research Center, Freie Universität Berlin; Faculty of Policy and Planning, TERI University, New Delhi; Institute for Environmental Studies, VU University Amsterdam; Global Change Programme, Jadavpur University, Kolkata and Department of Ecology and Environmental Science, Pondicherry University. Launched in January 2013 in New Delhi, IECGN grew to include a number of distinguished scholars engaged in catalyzing research on many critical themes related to multi-level climate governance including the role of different set of actors, such as cities, social movements, industries, as well as identifying climate governance as a cross-cutting theme within other areas of research such as energy transitions, food security and sustainable development, among others. After two successful events organized in New Delhi and Kolkata in 2013, a number of workshops and conferences will be organized in partner countries with the aim of generating collaborative research and exchange of knowledge among the participants.

New paper on the The Changing Architecture of International Climate Change Law

March 3, 2014 in News, Publications by Oscar Widerberg

Harro van Asselt, Michael Mehling and Clarisse Kehler Siebert just published a new paper on The Changing Architecture of International Climate Change Law. The paper provides the reader with a great analysis on the history and future of climate law as a whole and on its relationship with other legal fields. The authors argue that there are six observable trends in climate law: (i) the multiplication of international forums addressing climate change; (ii) the softening of commitments; (iii) the changing nature of differentiation; (iv) the utilization of innovative policy instruments; (v) the increasing focus on litigation; and (vi) the growing importance of nonstate actors and transnational governance.

The paper is free to download via the Social Science Reseach Network site here: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2402770

PhD post at Lund University on fragmentation in climate change governance

February 17, 2014 in News by Oscar Widerberg

An exciting opportunity has come up at Lund University in Sweden to work on institutional complexity and fragmentation in climate change. They are looking for someone to pursue a PhD in political science on climate change and international relations. Here’s a summary from the ad: “The aim of the project is to analyze the increasing institutional complexity of global climate governance. The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and its Kyoto Protocol do not operate in an institutional vacuum. They interact with a complex environment of many other institutions, both public and private, that operate at different scales and across different sectors and policy fields. This institutional complexity matters: it has major consequences for key governance aspects like effectiveness, legitimacy and participation.”.

Main point of contact is Fariborz Zelli who is also CONNECT project collaborating scholar. The position was announced a while ago and last date for application is on the 3rd of March.

For more info, see here.

New report on Climate Clubs

December 1, 2013 in News, Publications by Oscar Widerberg

UN-led negotiations on climate change are to deliver an agreement in Paris in 2015. In parallel to the UNFCCC, some countries have decided to create or join climate initiatives, so called clubs. The G8, the Climate and Clean Air Coalition (CCAC), and the Major Economies Forum (MEF), are prime examples of these climate clubs.

While some observers put great faith in these clubs, others see a risk that the proliferation of climate clubs should undermine the UNFCCC. This report is an attempt to address this question. The results of this study show that there are few signs of a conflictive relationship between the clubs and the UNFCCC, and that they could play an important role in paving the road to Paris.

While the current set of clubs are not challenging the current climate governance architecture, it should be noted that some clubs are more conducive to the UNFCCC than others.

You can download the report here: Climate clubs and the UNFCCC .

Debate article in Swedish daily: Don’t declare the UNFCCC dead!

November 24, 2013 in News, Publications by Oscar Widerberg

Today a few of the fragmentation community’s collaborating scholars wrote an op-ed on global climate negotiations. It is featured in one of Sweden’s largest dailies, Svenska Dagbladet. The text is in Swedish but discusses the importance of managing expectations and appreciate everything that’s going on beyond the UNFCCC. All the other great things happening while the formal negotiations are at a stand-still should be acknowledged and seen as a positive sign that something is happening on a global level.

You find the article here: http://www.svd.se/opinion/brannpunkt/klimatforhandlingar-bor-inte-dodforklaras_8758058.svd

 

CONNECT Working Paper “Measuring Degree of Fragmentation in Global Climate Governance” presented at the 8th Pan-European Conference on International Relations

October 17, 2013 in Conferences, News, Publications by Marija Isailovic

We are pleased to announce that our paper Mapping and Measuring the Degree of Fragmentation in Global Climate Governance Architecture by Oscar Widerberg and Marija Isailovic was presented at the 2013 8th Pan-European Conference on International Relations “One International Relations or Many? Multiple Worlds, Multiple Crises” that took place from 18-21 Semptember, Warsaw, Poland. The paper was presented as part of the panel “Mapping Global Governance: How Transnational Networks and Regimes Shape Global Policies”. The full paper can be accessed here.

Abstract:
Global climate governance has changed dramatically since the adoption of the United Nation Framework Convention on Climate Change in 1992. From being a chiefly state driven process, today’s architecture of global climate governance is characterized by a patchwork of institutions, actors, norms and discourses. Governance arrangements have emerged from bottom-up processes and resulted in non-hierarchical structures where non-state actors such as NGOs, firms, and cities, and hybrid actors such as networks and partnerships take center-stage. As a result global climate governance has become complex, polycentric, or rather, fragmented, both vertically between supranational, international, national, and subnational layers of authority, and horizontally between parallel rule making arrangements.
To understand the impact of fragmentation on policy outcomes we need a framework for mapping institutions and actors active in global climate governance and their associated norms and discourses. Mapping fragmentation and exploring the impacts on policy is a growing field of interests for IR scholars. However, current attempts to map fragmentation are insufficiently integrated in terms of level and depth. Studies focus too much on either the relations between MEAs or on the transnational level. To advance the understanding of fragmentation we need to integrate levels of analysis between institutions and actors and their underlying norms and discourses.
To bridge this gap we first develop an analytical framework assessing the level of fragmentation in global governance architectures. The framework will build on Biermann et al. (2009) and lend from realist, liberal, institutional IR traditions, as well as constructivist approaches to map fragmentation in terms of institutions, actors, norms and discourses. Second, to test the framework, we apply it to the global climate regime complex. The results feed the vibrant debate on the causes, properties, and implications of fragmentation in global environmental governance.